Thirty objects. One question each.

Is what is sold what is registered?

Up-to-date full-text certificate, checked at the registry.

Annotation of the development registration and undeclared encumbrances.

Does what is registered match what is offered?

Filed project memorial (art. 32 of Lei 4.591/1964) against sales material.

Area table diverging from the listing.

Is what was executed what was declared?

Field measurement, item by item, dated.

The lending agent's independent measurement.

Is buyers' money segregated?

Escrow registration and statements of the linked account.

The committee of representatives.

Is the construction authorized the way it is being done?

Permit, approved project and conditions, checked at the agency.

Project change without new approval.

Do the assumptions hold up against primary data?

Cost, timeline and absorption against external sources and own history.

Declared absorption with no basis.

Does the declared area exist and is it in good standing?

CAR, georeferenced property record, satellite imagery.

Overlapping polygons.

Is what was produced what was declared?

Delivery manifests, invoices, remote monitoring.

The track record of previous harvests.

Does what was pledged as collateral exist and is it unencumbered?

CPR registration, pledge, inspection report.

The same harvest given as collateral twice.

Does the irrigation have a right of use?

Current grant, flow rate and conditions.

Expired grant with a pending renewal request.

From origin to shipment, can the path be retraced?

Records by batch, from field to shipment.

The link between harvest and warehouse.

Do the declared machinery and storage exist and operate?

Direct observation, acquisition invoices, maintenance.

Leased equipment presented as owned.

Does the right exist, is it in force, and in whose name?

Case before the ANM, with phase and encumbrance.

An exploration-phase title presented as a mining title.

Measured, indicated or inferred — and by what method?

Report with sampling plan, technical lead and reference code.

The category declared above what the method supports.

Is the operation licensed for how it operates?

License, conditions and proof of compliance.

Expired condition.

Does the declared economic viability hold up against verifiable assumptions?

Approved PAE, costs, logistics and reference price.

The logistics cost to the port.

What does the asset carry with it?

Legal proceedings, embargoes, lawsuits, TACs (conduct adjustment agreements).

The previous owner's liabilities.

Does what is claimed to work, work with the real user?

Exercise in production, with a real profile, recorded.

The feature that only exists in a demo.

Whoever should not see, does not see?

Test by the negative, role by role.

The reading role that writes.

Is what goes in what persists and comes back?

Create, reopen and check, with a sample.

The field that records and does not return.

What underpins the platform, and what happens when it fails?

Inventory of third parties, keys, deadlines and continuity plans.

The key only one person has.

Is the declared processing what is practiced?

Policy against the actual data flow, operators named.

The operator the policy does not name.

Does a backup exist and does it restore?

Evidence restoration, dated.

The backup that was never restored.

Is whoever is working registered the way they work?

Payroll, eSocial and field observation.

The service provider that complies with working hours.

Was the declared training checked at the source?

Confirmation with the issuer.

The course certificate that no longer exists.

Who actually decides what?

Minutes, authority levels and actual decisions against the org chart.

The informal authority.

What changed at work after the program?

Before-and-after indicator, observation at the station.

The attendance sheet presented as the result.

Is what is declared what is done, visit by visit?

Records per visit against the written protocol.

The step no one records.

Does the service operate as it is licensed?

License, health surveillance and conditions, in the document and on site.

The new activity with no license of its own.

Does the claimed efficacy have a peer-reviewed basis, and is patient data stored as claimed?

Peer-reviewed literature; access trail tested against the negative case.

The internal study presented as proof.