ValidaAuditoria
We validate measurable health outcomes under strict regulatory standards.
Adherence between the declared and the practiced protocol, with a record trail per visit.
Licenses, health surveillance and operating conditions verified in the document and on site.
The efficacy claim confronted with the quality of the evidence that supports it.
Storage, access and use of health data tested by the negative — whoever should not have access, does not.
Origin, expiry and storage of medication and materials against what is registered.
What the patient signed against what was done.
What is measured, how it is measured, and whether the number makes it back to whoever is responsible for it.
What happens when the service fails: plan, contact, record.
Public references, cited as a verification criterion — not as a certification.
Organization of health services; surveillance.
Good operating practices for healthcare services.
Patient safety.
Código de Ética Médica (Code of Medical Ethics).
Electronic medical record.
Sensitive health data (LGPD).
Illustrative example · does not refer to any real development
Claimed"Protocol with proven clinical outcome."
Evidence examinedadherence between the declared and the practiced protocol, records per visit, and the quality of the cited scientific evidence.
StateVerified the adherence; the efficacy, to the extent of the evidence that supports it.
Caveathealth data is sensitive — verification preserves confidentiality and tests who should not have access.
You do not need to have everything. Knowing what is missing is also part of the scope.
Only with a legal basis, minimum access and a trail — and the opinion never identifies the patient. Whenever possible, access is tested by the negative, without reading content.
It evaluates adherence to protocol and credentials, not clinical competence.
It applies to any verifiable claim about care, structure or outcome.
We delimit the object, the applicable criteria and the independence boundary.
Collection and examination of primary data, documents and direct observation.
Confrontation between what is claimed and what is proven, with reality-checks and cross-referencing of sources.
A substantiated report, with explicit caveats — reproducible by a third party.
"Every claim comes out classified: verified or assumed."
Request an audit