We verify whether the development delivers what the memorial promises — on paper, at the registry and on site.
Chain of title, encumbrances, annotations and the correspondence between what is sold and what is registered.
The study's assumptions confronted with primary data — cost, timeline, absorption — and classified between verified and assumed.
Licenses, permits, the development's project memorial and the obligations the registration imposes on the developer.
The physical progress executed against the declared schedule, measurement by measurement, with direct site observation.
The segregation of buyers' money, in the record and in the statements.
What was promised in the sales contract against what the law and the memorial allow.
The budgeted against the incurred, by stage, with the cost breakdown open.
What was completed, checked against what the occupancy permit and the handover inspection record state.
5
Public references, cited as a verification criterion — not as a certification.
Real estate developments; project memorial, art. 32.
Public records; property record.
Segregated estate.
Urban land subdivision.
Rescission agreement.
Unit cost assessment.
Illustrative example · does not refer to any real development
Claimed"Seventy percent of physical progress executed."
Evidence examinedfield measurement, item by item of the physical-financial schedule, with dated photographic records and the site diary.
StateVerified the percentage the measurement finds — that is what the opinion writes, not the one declared.
Caveatapplies to the date of the visit; hidden works (foundation, embedded installations) checked by document, not by observation.
You do not need to have everything. Knowing what is missing is also part of the scope.
It does not replace; it confronts. Two measurements that coincide are worth more than one. Two that diverge are worth even more: they say where to look.
Yes, with the relationship declared on the first page and the same yardstick. The boundary is in the letter.
Yes. A narrow scope, closed, with what was left out stated as such.
We delimit the object, the applicable criteria and the independence boundary.
Collection and examination of primary data, documents and direct observation.
Confrontation between what is claimed and what is proven, with reality-checks and cross-referencing of sources.
A substantiated report, with explicit caveats — reproducible by a third party.
"Every claim comes out classified: verified or assumed."
Request an audit